1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Captiva. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 895 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Captiva |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 65 L |