1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 485 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | 6C | Bravo |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 58 L |