1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2010 Fiat Panda is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Panda. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Panda weights approximately 15 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2010 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | 6C | Panda |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 70.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 78.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 30 L |