1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 497 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1447 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 74 L |
