1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando. (174 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 650 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 6C | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2760 mm |
