1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lotus |
Model | AR 51 | Eclat |
Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2490 mm |