1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 342 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1996 Ford Ka | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | AR 51 | Ka |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 908 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2450 mm |