1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volkswagen |
Model | AR 51 | Polo |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |