1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 359 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 has manual transmission. 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | AR 51 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2776 mm |
