1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 154 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Kia RIO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2013 Kia RIO | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
| Model | AR 51 | RIO |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1096 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4045 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2570 mm |
