1954 Allard J2 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1960 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard J2 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1954 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1954 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Allard J2 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | J2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 79 L |
