1954 Allard K3 vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1965 Lotus Elan is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Allard K3 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Allard K3 | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Allard | Lotus |
Model | K3 | Elan |
Year Released | 1954 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |