1954 Allard K3 vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1966 Lotus Seven is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Allard K3 (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Allard K3 weights approximately 748 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Allard K3 | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Allard | Lotus |
| Model | K3 | Seven |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 432 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 29 L |
