1954 Allard K3 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 130 kg more than 1954 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Allard K3 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K3 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 3930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |
