1954 Allard K3 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Allard K3 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Allard | Caterham |
| Model | K3 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 36 L |
