1954 Allard K3 vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar

To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 335 kg more than 1954 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 217 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications: