1954 Allard K3 vs. 1996 Zagato Bravo
To start off, 1996 Zagato Bravo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher.
Because 1954 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Zagato Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Allard K3 | 1996 Zagato Bravo | |
Make | Allard | Zagato |
Model | K3 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |