1954 Allard K3 vs. 2000 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Allard K3 (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 120 kg more than 1954 Allard K3.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Allard K3 (217 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1954 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Allard K3 | 2000 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Allard | Mahindra |
Model | K3 | CL |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2040 mm |