1954 Allard K3 vs. 2002 Hyundai Getz
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Getz is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Getz (135 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Getz should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3.
Because 1954 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Getz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Allard K3 | 2002 Hyundai Getz | |
Make | Allard | Hyundai |
Model | K3 | Getz |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2460 mm |