1954 Allard K3 vs. 2003 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2003 Toyota Mark II is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 390 kg more than 1954 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Allard K3 (217 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1954 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Mark II. 2003 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 1954 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1954 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Allard K3 | 2003 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | K3 | Mark II |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |