1954 Allard K3 vs. 2007 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2007 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Allard K3 | 2007 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | K3 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2790 mm |
