1954 Allard K3 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Allard K3 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K3 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1999 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
