1954 Allard K3 vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W has automatic transmission and 1954 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1954 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Allard K3 | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Allard | SsangYong |
Model | K3 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3270 mm |