1954 Allard K3 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1954 Allard K3. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1954 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Allard K3. (217 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Allard K3 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K3 | UTE |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |