1954 Alvis TA 21 vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alvis TA 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alvis TA 21 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1954 Alvis TA 21. (93 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1954 Alvis TA 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alvis TA 21 weights approximately 773 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Alvis TA 21 (204 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1954 Alvis TA 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alvis TA 21 | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Alvis | Lotus |
Model | TA 21 | M250 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1448 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |