1954 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 572 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Aston Martin DB3. (243 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Aston Martin DB3 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
| Model | DB3 | HRT |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2920 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 243 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
