1954 Austin A 135 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU

To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A 135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin A 135 (125 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin A 135 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 135 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A 135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A 135 (288 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 1954 Austin A 135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin A 135 has manual transmission. 1954 Austin A 135 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: