1954 Austin A 135 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 135. (125 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 135 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 135. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 135. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin A 135 has manual transmission. 1954 Austin A 135 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Austin A 135 2002 Jaguar XJR
Make Austin Jaguar
Model A 135 XJR
Year Released 1954 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 125 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 288 Nm 525 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.3 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 90.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.8:1 9.1:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1955 kg 1665 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2910 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]