1954 Austin A 30 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS (397 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 369 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 30.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS (601 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 547 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 30. (54 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 30.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 30 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 30 | CLS |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 601 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 58 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |