1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Daihatsu Bee
To start off, 1954 Austin A 40 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Daihatsu Bee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Daihatsu Bee would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin A 40 (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 40 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin A 40 (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. (36 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1954 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Daihatsu Bee.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1952 Daihatsu Bee | |
Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
Model | A 40 | Bee |
Year Released | 1954 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 36 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2000 mm |