1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1954 Austin A 40 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 269 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 40 | XK |
Year Released | 1954 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 63 L |