1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1954 Austin A 40 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Maserati A6G weights approximately 74 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Austin | Maserati |
Model | A 40 | A6G |
Year Released | 1954 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2560 mm |