1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3300 mm |
