1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1958 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 1958 Simca Plein Ceil is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1958 Simca Plein Ceil (56 HP @ 200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Simca Plein Ceil should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Simca Plein Ceil weights approximately 70 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 1958 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Austin | Simca |
| Model | A 40 | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1958 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2360 mm |
