1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1962 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Isuzu Bellel (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 204 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1962 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Austin | Isuzu |
Model | A 40 | Bellel |
Year Released | 1954 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2540 mm |