1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1970 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1970 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.
Because 1970 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1970 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 1970 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 40 | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2060 mm |
