1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1972 Holden Monaro
To start off, 1972 Holden Monaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Holden Monaro (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Monaro weights approximately 314 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1972 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 40 | Monaro |
Year Released | 1954 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |