1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 309 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | El Camino |
Year Released | 1954 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2980 mm |