1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1979 Chevrolet K-20
To start off, 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 has automatic transmission and 1954 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1954 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 1979 Chevrolet K-20 | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | K-20 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
