1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1980 Honda Prelude
To start off, 1980 Honda Prelude is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,602 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Honda Prelude is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 40 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1980 Honda Prelude.
Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Honda Prelude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1980 Honda Prelude | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 40 | Prelude |
Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2330 mm |