1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 294 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | A 40 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1954 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |