1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 344 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (200 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Armadillo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | A 40 | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 1850 mm |
