1954 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 40 weights approximately 91 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Clio |
Year Released | 1954 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |