1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Caterham 7
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 40 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2000 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Austin | Caterham |
Model | A 40 | 7 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 8600 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2230 mm |