1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Express is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 157 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Express (408 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 2000 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | Express |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 15 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 6210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 2090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3940 mm |
