1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Lamborghini Diablo
To start off, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (485 HP) has 444 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (633 Nm) has 549 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm). This means 2000 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 2000 Lamborghini Diablo | |
| Make | Austin | Lamborghini |
| Model | A 40 | Diablo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 5707 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 485 HP |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 633 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2660 mm |
