1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2001 Eagle Talon

To start off, 2001 Eagle Talon is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Eagle Talon (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Eagle Talon weights approximately 394 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Austin A 40 2001 Eagle Talon
Make Austin Eagle
Model A 40 Talon
Year Released 1954 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 41 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1026 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4130 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1570 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2520 mm