1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki F1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki F1 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki F1 (106 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm). This means 2002 Suzuki F1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Austin A 40 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Austin | Suzuki |
| Model | A 40 | F1 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 45 L |
