1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 596 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 40 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |