1954 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1836 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Austin A 40 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 21.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 2862 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |